This site is only a doorway

Everything here is gathered from things other people actually researched, thought through, and built: books, papers, historical records, and the people behind them. If something here catches your interest, go look at the original sources listed at the bottom of the page. They carry more depth than a page like this ever can.

How Can One Animal, the Red Fox, Live in Arctic Tundra, Deserts, and City Parks?

Category: Living Things

Most animals are fussy about where they live. A polar bear stays near sea ice, and a camel stays in dry country. The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) is different. It lives in Arctic tundra, in deserts, in mountains, on farmland, and in city parks, across Europe, Asia, North Africa, and North America [1]. A wildlife database lists red foxes from sea level up to about 4,500 m (about 14,800 ft) [2]. This article follows one question: what lets a single species live in so many kinds of places? The short answer is that foxes eat almost anything and can use ready-made shelters, so they do not need one special kind of home. The more surprising part comes later: some cities may be good places to be a fox.

1. Where in the World Do Red Foxes Live?

Red foxes are native to Europe, Asia, North Africa, and the northern forests of North America. Humans later brought them to Australia and to warmer parts of North America [1]. One animal database describes them as having the widest distribution of any member of the dog family, the canids [2]. Australia's PestSmart site, which is run by invasive-species specialists, goes further and calls the red fox the most widely distributed meat-eating land mammal in the world [1].

Be careful with words like "most widespread." Different sources count differently, and this article does not rank animals. What the sources agree on is the list of habitats: tundra, deserts, forests, grasslands, farms, and towns. PestSmart describes the red fox as absent from the tropics [1]. So even this very adaptable animal has limits.

2. Foxes Eat Almost Anything, So They Do Not Need One Special Place

A first clue is food. Red foxes eat small mammals such as mice, rabbits, and voles, and also birds, reptiles, insects, fruit, and eggs. They scavenge too, eating dead animals and leftovers in rubbish [1][2]. An adult fox needs roughly 0.5 to 1 kg (about 1 to 2 lbs) of food a day [2].

Think about what that means. An animal that can only eat one thing has to live where that thing lives. An animal that can switch between mice in summer, berries in autumn, and scraps in winter can settle almost anywhere that offers some mix of those. A simple way to picture it is that the fox does not search for a perfect place. It makes a living out of whatever a place has. That is a way of explaining the pattern, not a rule stated in the sources.

3. Dens: A Safe Home Can Be Dug or Borrowed

Food is only half of it, because a fox also needs a shelter for sleeping and raising pups. Foxes keep a main earth den and several backup burrows within their home area. They often take over burrows dug by other animals, such as rabbits or marmots. Larger dens may be dug for winter and for raising young, and the same den is often used by later generations [2].

That matters in the city. A fox does not need a forest to dig in if it can find a quiet bank, a space under a shed, or a hollow in a cemetery. In the Warsaw study described below, researchers recorded dens as part of the evidence for where foxes lived [3].

How much ground does one fox use? In good habitat, an adult's home range is about 5 to 12 km² (about 2 to 5 square miles). In poorer habitat it grows to 20 to 50 km² (about 8 to 19 square miles) [2]. These figures are consistent with foxes using more land where the habitat is poorer.

4. What Happened When People Took Red Foxes to Australia?

If foxes really can live almost anywhere, a test would be to put them somewhere new. People did, long ago. Red foxes were brought to Australia in the 1850s, and they began spreading from Victoria, in the southeast, toward the north and west [1]. Australia's PestSmart site says the spread was linked to the spread of European rabbits, and that people also released foxes in new areas on purpose. Foxes moved fastest across inland saltbush and mallee country, which are dry shrublands [1].

Today, foxes occupy about 76 percent of the continent, with the far tropical north left out [1]. That fits the earlier clue: foxes spread far, but the tropics seem to stop them.

This is a story about an introduced animal, so it is not all good news. PestSmart is a site about managing invasive species, which tells you how Australia views the red fox there. Whether an animal "belongs" in a place is a different question from whether it can survive there, and this article only covers the second one. It also does not cover how Australia manages foxes.

5. Foxes in Cities: Warsaw's Green Spaces Went from 21% to 93% Fox Territory

Now for the more surprising part. PestSmart notes that foxes reach their highest densities in places shaped by humans [1]. A long study of Warsaw, Poland, shows one example. Researchers checked 29 green areas in the city, which were parks, cemeteries, forests, and riverbank strips. In 1976 to 1978, foxes had settled in 21 percent of them. In 2004 to 2012, the share was 62 percent (18 areas). In 2016 to 2019, it was 93 percent (27 areas). Foxes were also found in all 593 one-kilometer grid squares of the city checked in 2005 to 2012 [3].

Notice what this does and does not show. It shows that foxes spread into most of the city's green spaces over about four decades. It does not tell us how many foxes there are, and it does not prove that foxes prefer cities. The authors also warn that reports of fox incidents are shaped by human activity and by whether people report them, so they only partly reflect real population changes [3]. The same study counted 608 reported fox incidents in 1998 to 2015, and about 47 percent involved dead foxes, mostly hit by vehicles [3]. City life brings risks as well as food and shelter.

The site PestSmart adds that fox young usually travel less than 50 km (about 31 miles) from where they were born, and less than 10 km (about 6 miles) in urban populations [1]. Could a city fox have less need to wander? The source gives the distances, not the reason.

6. How You Can Check a Home Range Number With Your Own Feet

A home range of 5 km² is easy to say and hard to picture. A square that is 1 km on each side has an area of 1 km². Take a map of your area, mark a square 1 km by 1 km, and look at what is inside: houses, parks, a river, a road. Then imagine five or more of those squares in a patch. That is the amount of ground one fox in good habitat might use.

If you want to look for foxes safely, look for tracks in snow or soft mud, or ask a local wildlife group or park office about sightings. Never approach a wild fox or feed one. Two questions to take further: Why might tropical places stop foxes, even though deserts do not? And is a city more like a forest edge or a farm to a fox? The sources below are good places to start.

Sources

  1. PestSmart (Centre for Invasive Species Solutions, Australia), "Fox biology, behaviour and ecology" https://pestsmart.org.au/toolkit-resource/european-red-fox/ (Supports native range, habitats, diet, introduction to Australia, 76 percent distribution, dispersal distances. Read as a web page summary; the figure of 76 percent is as given there.)
  2. Animal Diversity Web (University of Michigan Museum of Zoology), "Vulpes vulpes" https://animaldiversity.org/accounts/Vulpes_vulpes/ (Supports range description, elevation 0 to 4,500 m, diet amounts, dens, and home range sizes. Read as a summary through a page-reading tool, not word for word.)
  3. Jackowiak et al., "Colonization of Warsaw by the red fox Vulpes vulpes in the years 1976-2019," Scientific Reports (2021) https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8260808/ (Supports the 21%, 62%, and 93% figures, the 593 grid squares, and the 608 incidents. Read as a summary of the paper through a page-reading tool; the final few thousand characters were not read.)