This site is only a doorway

Everything here is gathered from things other people actually researched, thought through, and built: books, papers, historical records, and the people behind them. If something here catches your interest, go look at the original sources listed at the bottom of the page. They carry more depth than a page like this ever can.

Who Has to Stand on the Cold Edge of a Penguin Huddle?

Category: Living Things

Picture thousands of emperor penguins packed shoulder to shoulder in an Antarctic winter. The birds in the middle are snug. The birds on the windy outer edge are not. So who gets the edge? If it were the same unlucky birds every time, the huddle would be a bad deal for them.

This article follows that one question through four studies: why the middle is warmer, how long a huddle really lasts, what happens in a computer model where every bird is only looking out for itself, and what scientists saw when they filmed a real huddle from above.

1. A Huddle Saves Heat Because Fewer Body Surfaces Touch the Cold Air

A lone penguin loses body heat from nearly all of its surface. In a tight huddle, most of that surface is pressed against other warm bodies instead. Researchers who measured emperor penguins in Antarctica estimated that the part of a bird's body still exposed to the cold during tight huddling was about a quarter of its whole surface, roughly a 74% cut[1].

The same team worked out where the savings come from. Covering up body surface accounts for roughly two-thirds of the benefit, and the mild air inside the group roughly one-third (a rough estimate)[1]. Even a loose group helps: birds loosely grouped used about 39% less energy than birds on their own[1].

But "fewer surfaces exposed" is an average over the whole huddle. The birds in the middle have nearly none exposed, and the birds on the outer rim have a lot. That gap is what makes the edge such a hard place to stand.

2. Real Huddles Are Short and Birds Do Not Stay Put

Emperor penguins breed in the Antarctic winter, and the fathers balance a single egg on their feet for weeks. The old picture was of males packed into one big, long-lasting huddle. In 2006, a team that glued small data loggers to the feathers of eight marked males over several winters reported something different[2].

Over the breeding season the birds spent on average only 38% of each day huddling, and a typical huddle lasted about 1.6 hours (with wide variation, so some were far shorter or longer)[2]. Huddles formed, dissolved, and formed again. The same paper reported that, even though huddles were uneven, the birds had equal access to their warmth[2].

Only eight birds were tracked, so this is not proof about every penguin. But it moves the puzzle: if huddles keep forming and breaking up, a bird's spot is never permanent.

3. A Computer Model Shows Selfish Moves Can Still Share the Warmth Fairly

What kind of behavior would make the sharing fair? In 2012, three mathematicians built a model huddle[3]. In it, each penguin follows one rule: if I am on the windy side, move to a spot where I lose less heat, on the sheltered side. Penguins in the interior stay put. Nobody plans, and nobody takes turns on purpose.

The result was that every penguin ended up with roughly equal access to the huddle's warmth[3]. The huddle also crept slowly downwind, and a stronger wind made it more stretched out. That matches features of real huddles, such as their overall shape and downwind drift[3].

Two cautions. This is a computer model, not a recording of penguins following a rule. And the authors noted that real huddles looked more tightly packed than their no-randomness model predicted, so random wiggles probably matter in nature[3].

4. Filmed From Above, a Huddle Shows Tiny Steps Rippling Through the Crowd

A 2011 team filmed about 2,000 emperor penguins at the Neumayer research station in Antarctica, in air temperatures between -33 and -43 °C (about -27 to -45 °F). The huddle held about 21 birds per square meter (about 2 per square foot)[4].

What they saw looked a bit like a stadium wave. Every 30 to 60 seconds, penguins took small steps of about 5 to 10 cm (2 to 4 inches), and the movement traveled through the whole huddle at about 12 cm per second (under 5 inches per second)[4]. Most of the time the birds stand still and tightly packed, and then a ripple releases and re-packs them.

The researchers suggested three jobs for these ripples: repacking the huddle as densely as possible, helping the whole huddle move and smaller groups merge, and slowly reshuffling the huddle over time so heat is shared out more evenly[4]. These are proposed functions. The study did not directly test whether the ripples are how birds swap places, and it did not show that each bird gets a fair turn at the edge.

Back to the opening question. Evidence from the real birds says huddles keep changing and that birds had equal access to warmth. A simple rule can explain a fair result in a model. And the ripples may be part of how the reshuffling happens, though that connection is a hypothesis.

How to Test the Huddle Idea at Home

  • Warm-jar huddle. Fill four identical jars or mugs with the same comfortably warm tap water (warm to the touch, never hot). Stand three of them touching in a row on a tray and leave the fourth alone a few inches away. After 15 to 20 minutes, touch or measure each jar: the middle one, an end one, and the lone one. Which stays warmest? You are testing the basic idea of shared surfaces, not penguins themselves.
  • Swap the jars. Every five minutes, swap the middle jar with an end jar. Compare the three temperatures again after 15 minutes: are they closer together than in the first test? This is a toy version of what the model describes.
  • Read a paper's abstract. The 2011 paper on huddle waves has an abstract that fits on one screen. Look for the words the authors use for what they measured and what they only propose.

Sources

This article is a personal summary based on the public sources listed below.

  1. Caroline Gilbert, Stéphane Blanc, Yvon Le Maho, and André Ancel, "Energy saving processes in huddling emperor penguins: from experiments to theory," Journal of Experimental Biology 211 (2008). https://journals.biologists.com/jeb/article/211/1/1/17434/Energy-saving-processes-in-huddling-emperor (Read through the journal page's abstract-level content, not the full paper. The 39% saving for loosely grouped birds, the two-thirds and one-third split, and the roughly 74% reduction in exposed surface come from there. The estimates are from calculations based on measurements, and apply to the birds studied.)
  2. Caroline Gilbert, Graham Robertson, Yvon Le Maho, Yasuhiko Naito, and André Ancel, "Huddling behavior in emperor penguins: dynamics of huddling," Physiology & Behavior 88 (2006). https://arxiv.org/pdf/q-bio/0701051 (Author manuscript of the paper, read as text. The eight marked males, the 38% daily huddling time, the 1.6-hour average huddle with a spread of 1.7 hours, and the equal access to warmth were checked in the text.)
  3. Andrew Waters, François Blanchette, and Arnold D. Kim, "Modeling Huddling Penguins," PLOS ONE (2012). https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0050277 (Abstract-level content only; the full paper and its equations were not read. The single selfish rule, the roughly equal access result, the downwind motion, the effect of wind, and the authors' note about more compact real huddles come from there.)
  4. Daniel P. Zitterbart and colleagues, "Coordinated Movements Prevent Jamming in an Emperor Penguin Huddle," PLOS ONE (2011). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3106014/ (Abstract-level content only. The 2,000 birds, temperatures, density, 30 to 60 second interval, step size, wave speed, and the three proposed functions come from there. The article treats the functions as proposals, as the authors do.)

Update history

  • First published.