This site is only a doorway

Everything here is gathered from things other people actually researched, thought through, and built: books, papers, historical records, and the people behind them. If something here catches your interest, go look at the original sources listed at the bottom of the page. They carry more depth than a page like this ever can.

Why Do Japan's Open Grasslands Disappear When People Stop Burning and Mowing Them?

Category: Nature

A wide, grassy hillside can look as if it has always been that way. But many of Japan's grasslands are kept up by people: every year they cut the grass, set fire to it, or let cattle graze it. Japan has little grassland that is completely natural, so the grasslands that remain depend on that work [2]. Take the people away, and the butterflies and flowers that need open grass lose their home. In the early 1900s, more than a tenth of Japan was grassland. Today it is only about 1% [1]. This article follows one question: why does a grassland need people to stay a grassland? The main example is the Aso grasslands on the island of Kyushu, where people still burn the hills every year.

1. Why Scientists Call Many Japanese Grasslands "Semi-Natural"

Researchers sort grasslands into three kinds: natural, semi-natural, and artificial. Artificial grassland is a planted pasture. Natural grassland, grass that stays open on its own with no human help, is almost nonexistent in Japan, according to a researcher speaking at a Ministry of the Environment workshop [2]. In between is the semi-natural grassland (in Japanese, hanshizen sōchi). It is found in traditional rural landscapes, often called satoyama, where people have long used the surrounding fields, woods, and grasslands, and it needs gentle, regular use such as mowing, grazing, and burning to survive [2]. "Semi-natural" means that wild plants and animals live there, but people decide what the land looks like.

2. How Grass, Cattle, and Farms Kept Aso's Grassland Going

Aso, in Kumamoto Prefecture, has the largest area of grassland in Japan [3]. The Ministry of the Environment describes its grasslands as "thousand-year-old", kept going by continual use [3]. The use was practical. Until eating beef became common in Japan, more than a century ago, cattle at Aso were work animals that plowed fields and carried loads. The grass fed the cattle, and the grass was also spread on farm fields as fertilizer [3]. Fire is even older. A researcher at the Ministry of the Environment workshop said that traces of burning at Aso go back about 12,000 years, at first probably linked to hunting grounds, and that people later used the grass for farming and animals [2]. Then things changed. After World War II, products made from oil replaced grass as feed and fertilizer, and the grassland stopped being a place people needed to harvest [2]. That is the root of the problem: the grassland was never "abandoned" on purpose. People just stopped needing it.

3. What a Butterfly's DNA Says About Grassland Growing and Shrinking

Scientists have found a way to see this history in a living animal. A Kyoto University team studied kohyōmon-modoki, a butterfly that lives in semi-natural grasslands in central Japan and is listed as endangered on the Ministry of the Environment's Red List (category IB) [1]. They read DNA from today's butterflies and from old museum specimens, which let them estimate how many butterflies there were over two different spans of time: the past 10,000 years and the past 30 years [1]. The team's estimate is that the butterfly's population rose strongly from the middle of the Jōmon period, about 6,000 years ago, and then fell sharply over the last 30 years [1]. The team explains this by the size of the grassland. Soil and pollen records suggest that grassland spread as people's activities spread after the Jōmon period. In the early 1900s it covered more than a tenth of Japan, but dependence on fossil fuels and the planting of large tree plantations caused a steep drop, and it is now about 1% of the country [1]. That means the share of Japan covered by grassland fell to about one-tenth of what it was. These are rounded numbers from one press release, and the study looked at one butterfly species. Still, it fits a bigger picture: grass-loving species rose as people made grassland, and fell as people stopped.

4. Why Burning a Grassland Can Help the Plants That Live There

Setting a hillside on fire sounds like the opposite of protecting it. Yet at Aso, spring burning is part of how the grassland is kept. According to the researcher at the ministry workshop, burning leaves bare ground in spring, which suits plants that sprout early. The researcher added that the soil just below the surface does not get very hot, so damage to living things is not large [2]. This describes Aso, and burns in other places, or burns at other times of year, may not behave the same way. Mowing helps too: cutting keeps pampas grass (susuki) from taking over, which lets other plants grow among it [2]. The payoff is biodiversity, meaning how many different kinds of living things share a place. According to the workshop report, Aso's grasslands support about 600 plant species, including endangered and locally endemic ones. Some plants that came from the Asian continent long ago also survive there [2]. Japan's Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries likewise describes the Aso system, in which people manage the grassland by burning, grazing, and mowing, as home to many rare plants and animals [5].

5. How People Keep Aso's Grassland Alive Today

The Ministry of the Environment says the work is getting harder. Fewer farmers raise cattle and horses, many farmers are older and have no one to take over, and so unused grassland is growing. As a result, grassland scenery is being lost and ecosystems are changing, and the ministry notes that forest fires and landslides become more of a risk as the grassland deteriorates [3]. In 2005, the Aso Grassland Restoration Committee was formed. Pasture associations, neighborhoods, nonprofits, local residents, and local governments joined on their own to work together [3]. Volunteers help with burning the grass and with cutting firebreaks, bands of cleared ground that help keep a fire where it is meant to stay [3]. The committee is also trying to reconnect grassland and farming again, for example by making compost from grassland plants and by increasing the number of cattle that graze there [3]. In May 2013, Aso's grassland was named a Globally Important Agricultural Heritage System, a program of the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization that recognizes traditional farming landscapes [3] [5].

6. Why the Timing of Mowing Matters for One Endangered Plant

Even "when" people cut the grass can change what survives. Another Kyoto University team studied suzusaiko, an endangered plant of semi-natural grasslands. They found that mowing during the flowering and fruiting season, July to September, lowered both the number of fruits and the plant's genetic diversity, meaning the variety in its genes. Mowing in winter and spring raised the number of fruits [4]. The scientists suggest that many endangered grassland plants also flower from summer to autumn, so the result may apply to others [4]. But this study tested one plant. Whether other plants follow the same rule has to be checked species by species. The same careful work that saves one flower might not suit another.

7. Try Comparing a Mown Patch with an Unmown One Near You

You do not need a giant grassland to see this idea. In a park, a school field, or a roadside strip where you are allowed to walk, look for a spot that is mowed often and another that has been left to grow. Compare how tall the grass is and how many kinds of flowers you can count in each, and take photos or notes. If you can find out when each spot was last cut, you can ask the same question the Kyoto team asked: could the timing explain the difference? Stay on paths or places open to the public, do not use blades, and never light a fire, because burning belongs to trained local groups. To read more, start with the Kyoto University press releases [1] [4] and the Ministry of the Environment pages about Aso [3]. One question to take with you: if a grassland is only there because of people, who should look after it when fewer people need it?

Sources

  1. Kyoto University, research news, "Elucidating the history of grassland butterflies from the Jōmon period to the present" (February 2018). Paper: Nakahama, Uchida, Ushimaru & Isagi, Heredity 121, 155–168 (2018) https://www.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ja/research-news/2018-02-28 (Butterfly numbers over time, grassland area in the early 1900s and today. The press-release page, in Japanese, was read in full. The English version of the page was not available, and the journal paper itself was not read.)
  2. Ministry of the Environment, Satonavi, report on the 2010 workshop in Kumamoto (in Japanese) https://www.env.go.jp/nature/satoyama/satonavi/report/h22_08.html (Three grassland types, history of burning at Aso, effects of burning and mowing, about 600 grassland plant species. This is a summary of one researcher's talk, not a peer-reviewed study. The text was read up to the point where the page excerpt was cut off.)
  3. Ministry of the Environment, Aso-Kuju National Park, Mt. Aso Visitor Center, "Sustaining Grasslands" https://www.env.go.jp/en/park/aso/data/mtasovc/sustaining-glasslands.html (Largest grassland area in Japan, decline of use, the 2005 committee, firebreak volunteers, the 2013 agricultural heritage designation. English page; the Japanese version was also checked for the beef and farm-work passage.)
  4. Kyoto University, research news, "Timing of mowing and endangered grassland plants" (January 2016). Paper: Nakahama, Uchida, Ushimaru & Isagi, "Timing of mowing influences genetic diversity and reproductive success in endangered semi-natural grassland plants," Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 221, 20–27 (2016) https://www.kyoto-u.ac.jp/ja/research-news/2016-02-16 (Mowing season, fruit number, genetic diversity. Press-release page in Japanese, read in full. The journal paper was not read.)
  5. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems, Aso region (in Japanese) https://www.maff.go.jp/j/nousin/kantai/giahs_3_040.html (Designation in May 2013 and the summary of burning, grazing, and mowing. Only the headings and summary line were read.)